How do I write a review article? (2023)

FAQs

How do you answer an article review? ›

Reviewers should consider the following questions: What is the overall aim of the research being presented? Is this clearly stated? Have the Authors clearly stated what they have identified in their research?

Write an informative summary of the material. Condense the content of the work by highlighting its main points and key supporting points. Use direct quotations from the work to illustrate important ideas. Summarize the material so that the reader gets a general sense of all key aspects of the original work.

The structure of a response paper is standard for academic writing: there should be an introduction in which you present your source text and your response, body paragraphs in which you support and explain your response, and a conclusion that wraps up your paper and leaves your reader with something to think about.

A question often asked by authors, but also important to editors, is how long does it take between submission and publication of an article. This is a hard question to answer, but often peer review is the lengthiest part of this process. Journals usually ask reviewers to complete their reviews within 3-4 weeks.

Experts. If you're an absolute beginner at this, a 1000 word article should take you about 3 to 4 hours. A 2000 word article should take you about 6 to 8 hours. The reason it takes so long is because you're not experienced with writing consistently.

A well-written review article must summarize key research findings, reference must-read articles, describe current areas of agreement as well as controversies and debates, point out gaps in current knowledge, depict unanswered questions, and suggest directions for future research (1).

What is the structure of a review article? ›

Title. The abstract consists of two main parts: a) the background and purpose of the study (in a sentence) and b) an explanation of the various parts of the article. The last sentence presents the conclusion and future orientation of the research.

Across all fields, these results suggest authors should review at least one publication per article they produce to balance the peer review system.

The most important element of a review is that it is a commentary, not merely a summary. It allows you to enter into dialogue and discussion with the work's creator and with other audiences.

Closely related to originality, a 'good' review will also challenge previous ideas and contribute to understanding of certain topics, areas or ideas. Again, this means that review articles need to go beyond mere description and 'state-of-the-literature' summaries and develop new ideas and ways of thinking.

Verb She hasn't yet responded to my letter. My mother responded to my request with a firm no. The teacher asked a question, but the student didn't respond.

He got a response to his letter. I am writing in response to your letter of July 17. When I told him my plan, I wasn't expecting such an enthusiastic response. Her response to their decision was to threaten to quit her job.

You should include the author's name and the title of the text you are writing about, and you must state precisely and concisely what you are going to argue, prove, or analyze about the text. Creating a strong argumentative topic sentence is perhaps the most crucial step in writing a critical response paragraph.

What is a response? Response: how the organism reacts to a stimulus and results in a change in behavior. (It is a fancy way of saying “effect”.) Example: Getting a drink when you are thirsty.

Sentence Starters for Reading Responses

I felt (angry, sad, joyful, surprised, upset, satisfied) because... This story reminds me of something that happened to me... This was similar to a situation in my own life when... This relates to another (book, article, short story) I've read because.....

What phrases to use in a response paper? ›

Review articles are an important staple of medical and other scientific literature that are liked and sought after by both readers and journals. The common perception is that they provide credible and reliable information about a specific area to readers and bring readership to journals.

One to two pages is typically the norm; however, I have submitted a few three- to four-page reviews when I thought an article was already quite good, but could be better.

For a Review Article, the target length is 4,000–5,000 words, plus notes.

Writing 30 pages will take about 6.3 hours for the average writer typing on a keyboard and 12.5 hours for handwriting. However, if the content needs to include in-depth research, links, citations, or graphics such as for a blog article or high school essay, the length can grow to 50 hours.

When starting out in their content writing career, a beginner writer can take three to four hours to write a typical 1000-word article. If you're at this stage, it can feel frustrating to hear about experienced writers working much faster than you. However, working at this pace is a natural part of your development.

Writing 500 words will take about 12.5 minutes for the average writer typing on a keyboard and 25 minutes for handwriting. However, if the content needs to include in-depth research, links, citations, or graphics such as for a blog article or high school essay, the length can grow to 1.7 hours.

In fact, many topics can be adequately covered with just under 900 – 1,000 words. However, if you're using a lot of original research and covering a unique area of recruiting, you'll probably want to go longer and be closer to 1,200 words.

After analyzing many book reviews (most or all of which are from mainstream sources), Campbell suggests four elements of criticism: reaction, summary, aesthetic appraisal and historical appraisal.

How do you write a review example? ›

A good review includes enough detail to give others a feel for what happened. Explain which factors contributed to your positive, negative or just so-so experience. You might also offer your view on what the company is doing well, and how they can improve. But keep things friendly and courteous!

Unlike original research articles, review articles are considered as secondary literature. This means that they generally don't present new data from the author's experimental work, but instead provide analysis or interpretation of a body of primary research on a specific topic.

Introduction: The Introduction should then expand on the Abstract and set the scene. Provide context by first introducing the topic: why is this topic interesting/significant, what do we know about it so far, how has the field progressed, what has the new progress shown?

Regular journals do invite expert authors occasionally or accept proposal for review papers. The general emphasize is that the author should have contributed significant literature in a particular field to qualify for writing review article.

Expert-verified answer

A review is a critical assessment of a book, film, or play in which the reviewer evaluates a film, video game, musical composition, or book and expresses his opinion on its content.

1. A short summary of the reviewer's overall understanding of the manuscript. 2. An overview of the reviewer's impression of the work, whether it will contribute to existing knowledge in the field, and if it will be of interest to the target audience.

Step 1: Briefly analyse the given topic…

Secondly, find a discussion part – in other words, try to find the specific points you need to comment on in your text. Finally, find the target reader so you know exactly who you are writing for and who is going to read your review.

The following is a brief description of five qualities of good writing: focus, development, unity, coherence, and correctness. The qualities described here are especially important for academic and expository writing.

The critical review is a writing task that asks you to summarise and evaluate a text. The critical review can be of a book, a chapter, or a journal article.

The journal's editor sent your manuscript to two or more reviewers, and at least one of them felt that substantial changes were needed. However, some added work and/or explanation can resolve these issues. That's interpreted as major revisions.

What is the purpose of review paper? ›

The purpose of a review paper is to succinctly review recent progress in a particular topic. Overall, the paper summarizes the current state of knowledge of the topic. It creates an understanding of the topic for the reader by discussing the findings presented in recent research papers.

Authors should distinguish their responses from the reviewers' comments by using phrases such as “author response” and/or a different font color. Then, each response should clearly explain the change made and where that change can be found in the revised manuscript (i.e., page number, paragraph, and/or line).

Generic positive review response examples

“Thanks so much for sharing your experience with us.” “Thank you so much for taking the time to leave us feedback.” “Is there anything we can do to improve?” “We hope to see you again soon!”

“We are so grateful for your 5-star review. Thanks for sharing your rating with us and the community.” "Thank you for the 5 star rating." "Thank you so much for taking the time to leave us a 5 star rating - it's much appreciated!"

Open your review with the most important comments—a summarization of the research and your impression of the research. Make sure to include feedback on the strengths, as well as the weaknesses, of the manuscript. Examples and explanations of those should consume most of the review.

Review articles can be of three types, broadly speaking: literature reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Review articles can be of varying lengths depending upon the journal and subject area.

How to summarize an article? ›